Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11328/4261
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOrtega, Javier-
dc.contributor.authorVasconcelos, Graça-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Hugo-
dc.contributor.authorCorreia, Mariana-
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Tiago Miguel-
dc.contributor.authorVicente, Romeu-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-20T15:33:13Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-20T15:33:13Z-
dc.date.issued2019-10-
dc.identifier.citationOrtega, J., Vasconcelos, G., Rodrigues, H., Correia, M., Ferreira, T. M., & Vicente, R. (2019). Use of post-earthquake damage data to calibrate, validate and compare two seismic vulnerability assessment methods for vernacular architecture. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 39, (october 2019, article 101242). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101242. Repositório Institucional UPT. http://hdl.handle.net/11328/4261pt_PT
dc.identifier.issn2212-4209-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11328/4261-
dc.description.abstractThe paper presents and discusses the application of two large scale seismic vulnerability assessment methods on the island of Faial in Azores (Portugal). The two methods are specifically conceived to assess the seismic vulnerability of vernacular architecture. The first method follows a classical seismic vulnerability index approach and is referred as SVIVA (Seismic Vulnerability Index for Vernacular Architecture). The second method is referred as SAVVAS (Seismic Assessment of the Vulnerability of Vernacular Architecture Structures) and it is a numerical tool intended to estimate the seismic capacity of vernacular buildings in terms of seismic load factors associated with different structural damage limit states. The main reason behind the selection of Faial Island as a case study was the availability of post-earthquake reports of the building stock after the 1998 Azores earthquake, which allowed comparing the damage scenarios obtained using both methods with the post-earthquake damage data and thus helped for the calibration and validation of the two methods. The application of both methods led to a good fit between estimated versus observed damage grades, which validated their applicability as large-scale first level approaches. Moreover, as the main outcome, the paper presents the novelties of the SAVVAS method, which had not been applied before, and discusses its main advantages, namely: no need for calibration with previous post- earthquake damage data, an enhancement of the prediction capabilities, a more individualized evaluation of the buildings and the possibility to assess the seismic performance of the building in different loading directions.pt_PT
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.relationFEDER funds through the Competitivity and Internationalization Operational Programme – COMPETEpt_PT
dc.relationFCT – Foundation for Science and Technology within the scope of the project POC1-01-01-0145-FEDER-007633\.pt_PT
dc.relation.ispartofseries;101242-
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_PT
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/pt_PT
dc.subjectPost-earthquakept_PT
dc.subjectSeismic vulnerability assessmentpt_PT
dc.subjectVernacular architecturept_PT
dc.subjectStone masonrypt_PT
dc.subjectVulnerability indexpt_PT
dc.subject1998 Azores earthquakept_PT
dc.titleUse of post-earthquake damage data to calibrate, validate and compare two seismic vulnerability assessment methods for vernacular architecturept_PT
dc.typearticlept_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212420919301839pt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
degois.publication.volume39pt_PT
degois.publication.issue101242pt_PT
degois.publication.titleInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reductionpt_PT
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101242pt_PT
Appears in Collections:CIG - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais / Papers in International Journals



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.