Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3668
Title: How to fairly allocate scarce medical resources? Controversial preferences of healthcare professionals with different personal characteristics
Authors: Pinho, Micaela
Araújo, Alexandra M.
Keywords: Distributional justice
Distributive preferences
Healthcare professional attitudes
Healthcare rationing
Medical scarcity
Prioritizing
Socialization theory
Issue Date: Apr-2021
Citation: Pinho, M., & Araújo, A. M. (2021). How to fairly allocate scarce medical resources? Controversial preferences of healthcare professionals with different personal characteristics. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 10, 1-18. Doi: 10.1017/S1744133121000190. Disponível no Repositório UPT, http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3668
Series/Report no.: ;10
Abstract: The scarcity of medical resources is widely recognized, and therefore priority setting is inevitable. This study examines whether Portuguese healthcare professionals (physicians vs nurses): (i) share the moral guidance proposed by ethicists and (ii) attitudes toward prioritization criteria vary among individual and professional characteristics. A sample of 254 healthcare professionals were confronted with hypothetical prioritization scenarios involving two patients distinguished by personal or health characteristics. Descriptive statistics and parametric analyses were performed to evaluate and compare the adherence of both groups of healthcare professionals regarding 10 rationing criteria: waiting time, treatment prognosis measured in life expectancy and quality of life, severity of health conditions measured in pain and immediate risk of dying, age discrimination measured in favoring the young over older and favoring the youngest over the young, merit evaluated positively or negatively, and parenthood. The findings show a slight adherence to the criteria. Waiting time and patient pain were the conditions considered fairer by respondents in contrast with the ethicists normative. Preferences for distributive justice vary by professional group and among participants with different political orientations, rationing experience, years of experience, and level of satisfaction with the NHS. Decision-makers should consider the opinion of ethicists, but also those of healthcare professionals to legitimize explicit guidelines.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11328/3668
ISSN: 1744-1331 (Print)
1744-134X (Electronic)
Appears in Collections:REMIT – Artigos em Revistas Internacionais / Papers in International Journals

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Artigo MP AA (2021) ahead-of-print.pdf503.24 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.